Friday, September 04, 2015

Orban Speaks in Defense of Christian Europe

The Invasion of Europe from North Africa:

The Prime Minister of Hungary Speaks Words of Truth in Defense of Christian Europe 

By Michael Hoffman

Our friend of many years, Dolores (“Dee”) Lawless of Long Beach, California, who passed away in 2014 at age 93, would often moan when we would inform her that one of her putative “Christian” heroes had feet of clay. Like most of us, Dee longed for a true leader and would sometimes become momentarily angry at this writer for deflating her belief in this-or-that “conservative” Republican or Catholic (Dee was a pre-Vatican II Catholic), who we would point out, was a faker, or worse. Later she would recover from her disappointment and thank us for assisting her in identifying and frauds and traitors and denying them support and allegiance.

We wish Dee were alive now to see Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban in action. I know not his past record, or whether he will surrender in the future under the enormous force of the intimidation and outcry he is facing, but for the golden present how precious indeed are his words of truth, so seldom heard on the world stage from any national leader, least of all the self-extinguishing subversives who lead Germany and the Vatican, from whence Prime Minister Angela Merkel and Pope Francis issue decrees encouraging hundreds of thousands of aliens to settle in their land. 

We will believe that Merkel and Francis are sincere when they invite the hoards from Dar Al Islam who Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States will not harbor under any circumstances, into their private mansions and palaces. Merkel’s family home could probably house several hundred migrants and Vatican City could easily take 25,000 or so. It would be delightful to see a photo of both the migrant-welcoming German head of state and the pope of Rome  in a Bombay-like tableau with hundreds of people clinging to them and sharing, for the next several years, the bathroom, kitchen and bedroom of their palatial abodes. But of these scenes are ones we shall not see. The pattern of the  limousine liberals is always the same: it is we the peasants who will have to share our neighborhoods and pay taxes to fund the invasion and maintain the invaders, while the popes and prime ministers drive past in heavily guarded motorcades and wave, on their way to their specially reserved residences of serene tranquility.

Merkel and the pope are little more than managers of the decline and fall of Christian civilization and the white race; that is their mandate from the Money Power. Both the civilization and the race are slated to gradually disappear as part of the self-hating white-liberal genocide approved by politically correct, fellow white-liberals. 

Another aspect of the facilitation of the mass migration from North Africa is the imposition of ever more features of a police state to protect society from the crime and terrorism which the migrants will inevitably bring when they do not quickly obtain the gold, girlfriends and power to which they feel they are entitled as “oppressed people in a white society.” Gratitude toward that society is no longer present as it was among their far more humble grandparents who emigrated decades ago, when the Europeans and British respected themselves and fought back against the stereotype of their nations as wicked, racist white societies that nevertheless offer economic opportunities that are irresistible to Third World invaders.

Amid all of this insanity and treason has stepped forth Viktor Orban of Hungary, with words of startling and refreshing truth.

On Sept. 3 Mr. Orban, Hungary’s prime minister, wrote in a leading German newspaper that it was important to secure his nation’s borders from mainly Muslim migrants, “to keep Europe Christian. Those arriving have been raised in another religion, and represent a radically different culture. Most of them are not Christians, but Muslims,” Orban wrote in a commentary for Frankfurt Allgemeine Zeitung.

“This is an important question,” he said, “because Europe and European identity is rooted in Christianity. Is it not worrying in itself that European Christianity is now barely able to keep Europe Christian?” Mr. Orban asked. There is no alternative, and we have no option but to defend our borders. Our Christian obligation is not to create illusions. We think all countries have a right to decide whether they want to have a large number of Muslims in their countries. 

“If they want to live together with them, they can. We don’t want to, and I think we have a right to decide that we do not want a large number of Muslim people in our country. We do not like the consequences of having a large number of Muslim communities that we see in other countries, and I do not see any reason for anyone else to force us to create ways of living together in Hungary that we do not want to see.”

Dee, we have at last, this day at least, a leader!

Missing from mainstream news reports and editorials related to the controversy is the fact that the western-supported Israeli state is a specifically Judaic nation which Prime Minister Netanyahu recently warned could be overwhelmed by Arab voters. The Israelis deny to hundreds of thousands of Palestinian refugees the right of return to their homeland. Conservative and liberal partisans of “Israel” all say that these Arabs must be denied entry, otherwise they will predominate over the Judaic inhabitants. Why don’t the Christian leaders of Europe have the right to speak in this way about their nations’ preservation? If Christian leaders such as Hungary’s Viktor Orban are wrong, how is it that Judaic leaders in the Israeli state are correct? Or do Israelis alone have right to preservation of religion and heritage denied to the nations of the West? 

E-mail to the Hungarian Ambassador ( 

H.E. Réka Szemerkényi  
Ambassador Exraordinary and Plenipotentiary 
Embassy of Hungary, Washington D.C.  

Dear Ambassador Szemerkényi  

Please convey on my behalf and that of my colleagues and friends here in Idaho, USA, our deep appreciation to Prime Minister Orban for his courageous remarks defending Christian Europe and on behalf of its preservation. Our prayer is that the Prime Minister will continue to speak and act as he has, and not be intimidated by the pressure being placed upon him. May Jesus Christ grant Mr. Orban many blessings, and may God preserve the Christian people of Hungary. 

Michael Hoffman 


Thursday, September 03, 2015

Kim Davis in jail - some thoughts

Some thoughts on the imprisonment of Kim Davis

By Michael Hoffman

Suppose I choose to marry my sister or my mother — is that incest my “right”?

The move to make morality and ethics totally subservient to situation ethics reveals its bankruptcy. This is and always has been a matter of right and wrong. 

Incest is wrong and sodomy are wrong. The revolutionaries, with ethics born of the past 60 years, insist we obey their dictates. But what the rest of us want to know is, at what point does this mad revolution stop? Marriage for incestuous couples?  What if they "love each other"? 

There are consequences for tossing away three thousand years of Biblical-Christian civilization. 

Who decides what is bigotry? The new politburo? After which, those of us who adhere to thousands of years of Biblical morality instantly become “bigots.” 

Orwellian language strictures are imposed and the Thoreaus of our time, like Kim Davis, become targets for imprisonment and hate. Who really are the bigots? Is there such a thing as liberal bigotry?

I don’t see much “tolerance” from liberals on this issue; more like supremacist tactics advanced through appeals to tolerance. There ought to be far more compassion and understanding for Kim Davis’ conscience-stricken position than the derision we see poured on her by the commissars of political correctness who cheer her imprisonment. 

The Inquisition is back. 
Meanwhile, one enforcement question lingers: has anyone been jailed in San Francisco for violating Federal law by operating a sanctuary city for an illegal alien who murdered an American?

Wednesday, September 02, 2015

Orthodox Judaic children taught non-Jews are evil

At a Judaic school in London 
children are taught that non-Jews are evil 

This news report from Britain discusses the fear that hating non-Jews instills in Judaic children. It says nothing about the consequences to the goyim (non-Jews) that results from teaching Judaic children to hold goyim in derision, contempt and sub-human status, and making the oppression of them appear as a form of justifiable revenge and retribution.

The religion of Orthodox Judaism in general regards a goy as a lesser species of human; virtually a hominid. The bigoted instruction at Beis Rochel school is nothing out of the ordinary. What is unusual is that the instructors of hate were caught and that their indoctrination was publicly reported and exposed to scrutiny, in what is otherwise a media milieu that repeatedly puts forth an image of Judaism as the most benevolent and loving religion on the planet.

Three-year-old ultra-Orthodox Jewish children told ‘the non-Jews’ are ‘evil’ in worksheet produced by London school

Three-year-old ultra-Orthodox Jewish children told ‘the non-Jews’ are ‘evil’ in worksheet produced by London school

‘It’s not uncommon to be taught non-Jewish people are evil in ultra-Orthodox Jewish schools,’ former teacher claims

British three-year-olds have been told “the non-Jews” are “evil” in a kindergarten worksheet handed out at ultra-Orthodox Jewish schools in north London, it can be revealed...A whistle-blower, who wished to remain anonymous, has shown The Independent a worksheet given to boys aged three and four at the school. In it, children were asked to complete questions related to the holiday of 21 Kislev, observed by Satmer Jews as the day its founder and holy Rebbe, Rabbi Yoel Teitelbaum, escaped the Nazis. 

The document refers to Nazis only as “goyim” – a term for non-Jews some people argue is offensive. 

Emily Green, who used to teach at the same Beis Rochel girls’ secondary school, now chairs the Gesher EU organisation which supports ultra-Orthodox Jews who want to leave the community. 
“It’s not uncommon to be taught non-Jewish people are evil in ultra-Orthodox Jewish schools. It is part of the prayers, teaching, their whole ethos,” she said. Describing it as a form of “indoctrination”, Ms Green added:  “Psychologically, you become so afraid of the world out there after being taught how dangerous and bad and evil non-Jews are, that it makes it harder to leave.” 

 Independently translated from Yiddish for The Independent, the worksheet’s first question reads: 

•“What have the evil goyim (non-Jews) done with the synagogues and cheders [Jewish primary schools]?” The answer in the completed worksheet reads: “Burned them.” 

•Another question asks: “What did the goyim want to do with all the Jews?” – to which the answer, according to the worksheet, is: “Kill them.”

 “It doesn’t explicitly refer to the Holocaust,” the source said. “It’s a document that teaches very young children to be very afraid and treat non-Jews very suspiciously because of what they did to us in the past. It’s not a history lesson – you can’t say that. It’s a parable that is actively teaching the children extremism, hatred and a fear for the outside world.” 

A spokesperson for Beis Rochel said that the worksheets would be amended and apologized for any offense. However they argued the phrase “goyim” was not offensive and accusations that they were indoctrinating children were “without basis.” “The language we used was not in any way intended to cause offense, now this has been brought to our attention, we will endeavor to use more precise language in the future.


Tuesday, September 01, 2015

The Conscience of a Biblical Christian

Editor’s Note: It looks like all those appeals to conscience and civil disobedience that I heard during the Vietnam War, when laws were being broken by anti-war protestors and dissenters “for a higher good in the spirit of Thoreau,” are now down the drain when the conscience being violated is a Biblical one. 

Liberal = hypocrite. Their “tolerance” is a ruse to gain supremacist power over us and impose their revolutionary intolerance of 3,000 years of western morality. 

Their appeal is solely to situation ethics; their morality is as fluid as the zeitgeist. They have reduced the Ten Commandments to one, “Whatever.”

 They are building a sewer society on quicksand. They say “don’t judge” and “Christianity is love.” Persons engaged in incest claim they love each other and ask that we not judge them. How far down the rungs of the sewer do we descend, and how do we halt the descent based on nothing more substantial than situation ethics? 
— Michael Hoffman

Kentucky Clerk Denies Same-Sex Marriage Licenses, Defying Court

County Clerk Kim Davis 

A county clerk in Kentucky who objects to same-sex marriage on religious grounds denied licenses to gay couples on Tuesday (Sept. 1), saying she was acting “under God’s authority,” just hours after the Supreme Court refused to support her position. 

…(Kim) Davis told the Supreme Court that her Apostolic Christian faith forbade her to affix her name to a document endorsing the view that the marriages of gay men and lesbians were authentic. “This searing act of validation would forever echo in her conscience,” her lawyers told the court. 

…On one side, Ms. Davis’s supporters held signs with messages including, “Don’t give up. The answer’s on the way.” The clerk’s critics raised their own equally blunt placards with the declarations: “Small town, not small mind” and “You don’t own marriage.” 

Flavis McKinney, 72, who sipped a soda as he watched the dueling demonstrations, said he was unmoved by Ms. Davis’s opponents and that he had come to the courthouse “to stand up for God and his word, and to stand up for our clerk.” “I’ve raised five children, 13 grandchildren and four great-grandchildren,” said Mr. McKinney, who is retired. “Been married 52 years to the same wife, and God has blessed us because we’ve done it God’s way, not man’s way. We’ve obeyed God.” 

But Ms. Davis’s critics, many of whom appeared to be in their 20s and 30s, argued that she personified a dated approach to marriage. “It really just blows my mind that people can be so closed-minded,” said Shaina Cercone, a 22-year-old student at nearby Morehead State University. “…It’s 2015. Times have changed, and I think everyone that’s an American citizen needs to realize that. And if you’re a part of America, then you’re going to realize that change is a good thing, and you’ve got to go with it.” 

Ms. Davis’s supporters, including Mr. McKinney, said they were frustrated by the legal system that had brought Rowan County to Tuesday’s standoff. “Every court system that she’s had to go before is a rigged court,” he said. “If she should be fined or jailed, either one, I think it could be one of the most disgraceful things that ever happened in this county.” But he also said he was confident that with God’s help, Ms. Davis would ultimately prevail, even though her odds appeared to be narrowing. “He delivered Daniel from the lion’s den,” Mr. McKinney said. “So I trust he will deliver her.” 

Comment from NY Times reader Eric J

“I have no sympathy for Miss Davis if she gets imprisonment.” 

Many of the comments from the liberal readers of the Times are of this tenor: jail her. 

Read more at NY


Evidence of Hitler’s Gangsterism is Given the Silent Treatment

A Challenge to the Hitlerites

Revisionist Evidence of Hitler’s Gangsterism is Given the Silent Treatment — by “Revisionists”

By Michael Hoffman

Neo-Nazis and Hitler-sympathizing World War II revisionists, even though they claim to abhor the tactics of the Zionists, are giving our new study of the Führer’s gangland-style rub-out of Gregor Strasser, silent treatment worthy of the Zionist media, and for the same reason the Zionists do  — because they have no answer to our facts. The Führer, the object of their cultic adulation, must, like the Israeli state, be upheld at all costs.

We witnessed another revisionist anomaly last January when the eyes of the world were focused on the fate of the Charlie Hebdo cartoonists in Paris. We sought to focus that massive publicity and support for irreverent cartoon satire on the fate of Simon Sheppard and Steven Whittle, two revisionists in Britain who had gone to prison for publishing this writer’s comic-book satire, Tales of the Holohoax. (The court’s lengthy legal judgment against the publication and its distributors is here).

Alone among the revisionist editors who were aware of our campaign, only Bradley Smith of CODOH mentioned the parallels (he recently drew attention to our research concerning gentile bankers and usury). All other revisionist editors and publications of which we are aware, ignored a world-historic opportunity to gain publicity for revisionism and spotlight the hypocritical disparity between critics of Islam and critics of gas chamber orthodoxy by noting the imprisonment of Sheppard and Whittle and the contents of the outlaw-satire for which they were jailed.

We have the dubious distinction of being persona non grata in both the Zionist media and among our own revisionist fraternity, (assuming that our skepticism toward the claims of the Hitler cult has not vitiated our status as revisionists in the view of persons whose raison d’etre is the rehabilitation of Hitler and to make his life a template for the sought-after future leader of our people).

In the current September issue of our Revisionist History newsletter, we have provided the latest research in English into the life and ideology of Gregor Strasser, one of the greatest Germans of the 20th century, whose influence on the movement of German national renaissance is almost incalculable. This man of vision, this fighter against the banks and oligarchs, a hero of front line combat in World War I, was murdered  in 1934 by Adolf Hitler’s SS, at age 42.

Strasser was everything that Hitler had abandoned after 1933 so as to placate Germany’s Money Power sector and military-industrial complex. Likened by the German people to an oak tree for his incorruptibility, Strasser had to be liquidated if Hitler’s personal cult of messianic narcissism was to seize total control of the nation, as Von Papen had warned in his Marburg University speech of 1934, several days before Strasser was murdered in cold blood.

World War II revisionism is advertised by its adherents as a “great adventure in taboo-breaking and intellectual discovery.” Consequently, it follows that it should have no taboos of its own, least of all a de facto loyalty test to the Führer before one can be considered a member in good standing whose publications are worthy of discussion and debate.

Strasser joined the NSDAP in 1922. This writer became a committed gas chamber doubter as an adolescent in 1969 (after encountering Dr. David Hoggan’s pamphlet, The Myth of the Six Million)

We don’t know where many of the revisionists today — who will not read our evidence or facilitate an encounter with our data — were in ’69, but after a lifetime of writing, research and activism, we will not be policed out of the revisionist movement by self-appointed  suppressors who decry the censorship and silent treatment of rabbis and Zionist media, while, with a chutzpah that is comical, impose it on those who dissent from their own foibles and mythologies.

What kind of movement is it that can only maintain support for Adolf Hitler by ignoring the toughest challenges to that support? 

Fo those who are willing to fulfill the revisionist mandate, our study, “Hitler Had Him Murdered: Gregor Strasser, the German Visionary who could have led his nation to a new birth of freedom,” is available at this link:

Independent History and Research
Box 849, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho 83816 USA


Thursday, August 20, 2015

“Hoffman Takes Buchanan to the Woodshed”

Another home run by the Babe Ruth of revisionist historians. Mr. Hoffman again takes Mr. Buchanan, who should know better, to the woodshed. 

Michael, I regret we missed you as a speaker at the 2013 Rebuilding Christendom Conference hosted by ISOC back in 2013 when one of the topics there was Usury. With your Usury in Christendom book having been published around that time, your unique perspective  i.e., not compromising on 15 centuries of Church teachings against usury in any form  in comparison to the opinions of contemporary Catholics would have been invaluable to the attendees. Sadly, Catholics continue to serve Mammon to this day and I do not see a peaceful way out. Godspeed my friend.

— Nicholas Landholdt, Texas

Dear Nick

Thank you for your assessment of the August 19 Hoffman Wire column.

I was invited to the ISOC Conference this year, but after having given speeches in Michigan and Idaho in April and June and now working frenetically on my book on the “Occult Renaissance Church,” and a big September issue of our Revisionist History newsletter no. 80, I could not find the time to fit the three-day conference on the east coast into my schedule without further delaying these important projects

Of course I would have made usury the centerpiece of my oration to the assembled Catholics because most of them, whether “traditional” or not, continue to create lucrum cessans loopholes for profiting from loans of money  loopholes which Aquinas rebutted 800 years ago. Moreover, any open-minded person of goodwill can access my usury history through my book or the DVDs of my speech and question and answer session conducted in Lansing, Michigan last April. 

The question is, are these folks motivated to learn?….

The rest of this column appears in the September, 2015 issue of Revisionist History newsletter.


Wednesday, August 19, 2015

Pat Buchanan vs. Pope Francis

Capitalist Materialism as the 21st Century “Conservative” Ideal

By Michael Hoffman 

On July 14, 2015 Patrick J. Buchanan confronted Pope Francis’ economics in an essay titled, “Is Capitalism Diabolic?” (

Mr. Buchanan, a Knight of Malta, sought to preserve this pope’s “Vicar of Christ on earth” status while at the same time attempting to deconstruct the papal rhetoric concerning the predations of the Market.

Mr. Buchanan is a leader of the “paleo-Conservative” movement which supposedly distinguishes itself from neocon “Conservatism” by its fealty to the Old Republic and Jeffersonian ideals and values. Fifty years ago such fealty would have been synonymous with some critique, however token or anemic, of predatory capitalism and its enabler, usury. But in his July riposte to the pope, Pat makes no such distinctions. He’s over the top for capitalism without qualifiers, reminiscent of Ludwig von Mises, the anti-Christian, Austrian-Judaic arch-usurer (see our book, Usury in Christendom, pp. 276-277).

Buchanan commences his column with one of his trademark laurels for a Judas who is supposed to represent an admirable Conservative leader of the past who stood tall against whatever it is Pat seeks to denounce. In this instance, he chooses Pope St. John Paul II as the exemplary figure. Mr. Buchanan writes:

“On arrival in La Paz, Pope Francis was presented by Bolivian President Evo Morales with a wooden crucifix carved in the form of a hammer and sickle, the symbol of Lenin, Stalin, Mao and Fidel. Had Pope John Paul II been handed that crucifix, he might have cracked it over Evo’s head. For John Paul II had seen up close what communism did -- to his country, his church and his people in 45 years of Bolshevik rule. On his arrival in the Nicaragua of Daniel Ortega in 1983, Pope John Paul castigated a priest-collaborator who dared to serve that Sandinista Marxist regime as culture minister. And, while in Managua, he warned Catholics they were being threatened by ‘unacceptable ideological commitments.” 

Good ol’ Saint John Paul stood tall against the Left. We have a hero and a leader! 


Pat engaged in this archetypal showcasing with President Ronald Reagan’s legacy as well, mostly ignoring the catastrophes that Reagan initiated or enabled, fueling our national decline…

The rest of this column appears in the September, 2015 issue of Revisionist History newsletter.


Monday, August 17, 2015

New Revisionist History DVDs

Right Wing “Patriots" 
— Usurers Inc.

Your editor briefly stopped by the Independent Idaho Republicans conference held at a local hotel here in Coeur d’Alene over the weekend. The meeting might just as well have billed itself as Usurers Inc. or Shylock and Co., so numerous were the members of the Birchers, Mormons, Ludwig Von Mises Austrian School of Economics and Ayn Rand institute for enlightened godless selfishness. (Like Rand, Von Mises also detested Christ). Not one of them was familiar with 1500 years of Christian teaching against profiting from loans. Independent Idaho Republicans is a front for the kind of dog-eat-dog, predatory capitalist society that dumps unwanted children in abortion dumpsters. Idaho’s legal rate of usury is more than 450% on loans. These “patriots" could not care less. Usury simply is not an issue for them. In their indoctrinated minds, to restrict usury would be “socialism.” 

These people are dupes of the plutocracy. The Conservative movement is lost in the money vault of its own grasping avarice. “Conservatives" worship a God-forsaken idol, “The Market.” If these “Conservatives” ruled America, nothing about the reign of the love of money would change. And what else matters in comparison? 

We do not recognize usurers or usury-enablers as allies. For fifteen hundred years Christian civilization believed as we do. The First Revolution was the one that made profit on loans legal and moral, thereby making parasites (bankers and “wealth managers”) supreme over most creators: farmers, manufacturers, inventors, scientists, builders, mechanics, teachers, poets, writers and cognate vocations. Most in the latter category cannot accumulate wealth like usurers can. Hence, the Money Power becomes the supreme power in the land while “Conservatives" chase after symptoms, rather than this root of evil.

The following set of DVDs will help to educate men and women of good will who dwell in enforced ignorance on this vital subject. These DVDs are a relatively quick and painless way to learn the suppressed basis of western civilization and what made it great: the subjugation of the Money Power, which is the most important campaign of our time. Every other issue is a palliative in comparison, because all evil emanates from the Love of Money and from perverse defiance of and disobedience to the Words Jesus Christ clearly stated (Luke 6:30-36). How can we be blessed when the Austrian School of Economics continues to triumph over the Nazareth school, among the Right wing? If you think there are New Testament quotes that justify taking profit from loans, think again. These revisionist history DVDs prove otherwise—  and much more concerning medieval theology, Renaissance banking in Italy and Germany, and other learned topics vital to your understanding.

DVDs: Catholics, Protestants and Usury in the Renaissance and Early Modern Europe: 
A College-level Course in the Christian Theology of Money in Under Two Hours

In this fascinating lecture, given at Lansing Michigan in April of 2015, historian Michael Hoffman covers the contents of his book Usury in Christendom: The Mortal Sin that Was and Now is Not and answers challenging questions from the audience. Here is a unique opportunity to learn and understand what Christ, the Bible, the medieval thinkers and the Church taught about profit from loans and how that sacred doctrine, faithfully upheld for nearly 1500 years, was first overthrown by the situation ethics of revolutionary change agents within the Church of Rome. Hoffman’s history of how God’s law was slowly whittled away and how usurious bankers began to choose the personnel of the Church at the highest levels, represents a fascinating rebuttal to the laissez-faire Shylock economics which today controls the Conservative movement, the Church of Rome and most Protestant churches, rendering us powerless against our plutocratic enemies and making a mockery of true Christianity. Set of two all-region DVDs. In color and digitally recorded before a live audience. Approximately two hours. 

"It truly amazes me how you are able to deliver so much information in such a short space of time, and yet with such accuracy and in accord with all of the pasages in Scripture which pertain. You not only have studied the documentary record of history in great detail, you have also not missed the important parts of the historical narrative... And your oral delivery is flawless."  — Daniel Krynicki, Michigan